Subject	not 95>>>
Posted by	NV(Looking for next car) on August 16, 2000 at 10:28 PM
	This message has been viewed 122 times.
In Reply To	Re: 94-95 >>> more posted by scoTT [San Diego] on August 16, 2000 at 10:07 PM
Message	he say's he's going to dump a lot of money into this "project car" 95's have different heads that are hard to port and are limited to 550cc injectors... no 720's for 95's unless you swap out a lot of stuff.
Follow Ups	What is the best year for the Z32? (1990-1996) - Shinobi 21:53:52 08/16/00 Re: 94-95 >>> more - scoTT [San Diego] 22:07:54 08/16/00 not 95>>> - NV(Looking for next car) 22:28:09 08/16/00 lmao..I think you just sit there and wait for questions >>> - wesman [Z-less in big D] 23:10:00 08/16/00 yup this is getting repetitive.... - NV(Looking for next car) 23:25:42 08/16/00 BLASPHEMY!! shame, shame! haha. Don't go to the that>>> - Zster 23:36:41 08/16/00 CLK55: http://www.mercedes.com/e/cars/clk/clk55.htm (n/m) - scoTT [San Diego] 23:42:00 08/16/00 You are aware I am a college student with no job? LOL (n/m) - NV(Looking for next car) 00:16:59 08/17/00 no, I was not aware. sorry to tease you like that (n/m) - scoTT [San Diego] 00:21:50 08/17/00 Good choice Dan! BPU++ 6-Speeds are too much fun. =) (4nv) (n/m) - Brad (JSpecZ32) 07:30:58 08/17/00 You might want a 93'>>>>> - Zster 23:15:59 08/16/00 Yup. I've always said 93-94 is the way to go. (n/m) - NV(Looking for next car) 23:18:43 08/16/00
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.